跳到主要内容
ArcBlock Community

Reward pools twitter suggestion

That Crypto Barbie
项目
join-to-earndiscussion

Since on the test event Robert with more than 10k followers got like 70% of the pool, maybe on the basic pool event regarding twitter, the followers scale should me more gentle, thus 500 followers multiplier, 1k, 2k, 5k etc.

Also, when is that pool coming in? I thought it was gonna be q2?

Thanks.

10 条回复

Brain Titan2年前

Here’s a different approach: remove the twitter followers multiplier for future pools. Make the multiplier on something like number of posts the user has made about arcblock so far. Seems more fair💯

That Crypto Barbie 2年前

I think that's already stated by arcblock, that all shilling efforts are already documented

Brain Titan2年前

That’s good!

i still think the twitter followers multiplier should be removed from future pools though, it has 0 relevance to the nature of the pools, which aim to reward contributions. Having loads of followes has nothing to do with someone’s efforts in the abt ecosystem. Plus, followers can be bots or fake accounts

That Crypto Barbie 2年前

Obviously this goes against my interests but I'm open to accepting the team's decision about it.

That Crypto Barbie 2年前

Any update/ feedback on this?

Jason brown2年前

Yes I like this idea of not based on followers, but it should be based on content and how often they post. There are guys out here doing great writes up on ABT that should be rewarded.. that's my opinion.

Brain Titan2年前

I agree brother. Maybe it can be discussed in the upcoming ABT X space

Jason brown2年前

Yea, that would a great idea.

ken t2年前(edited)

Focus on Bug Bounties and also provide funds for developers to utilize (free upgraded DID space for a period etc ..)

Promotional reward pools, based on simple tasks like tweeting, are inherently flawed and cannot be assessed fairly. From my experience with the airdrop meta from 2022 to late 2023, I observed that bots often dominate majority of the allocations. Even when follower count multipliers are removed, individuals can easily create or purchase Twitter accounts and make multiple posts to have multiple entries(any preventive metrics such as account age and tweet frequency can be spoofed easily).

Such tasks, open to everyone, are susceptible to exploitation by armies of bots that scale rapidly and extensively, making it impossible for genuine participants to compete. Algorithms can never ensure fairness when relying on superficial metrics like impressions, tweet length, or even content quality especially when AI tools like GPT can easily generate content. Human assessment only introduces bias and centralization, contradicting the principles of decentralization.

Instead, focus on bug bounties, where skilled programmers are rewarded based on their technical expertise and real contributions. While this approach might initially seem unfair due to a small pool of developers claiming most rewards, as the ecosystem grows, the distribution will naturally become more equitable.

The only way to truly prevent abuses like fake accounts and bot manipulation is through irl KYC bound per participant, but this goes against the core tenets of decentralization. Therefore, adopting a bug bounty system offers a more sustainable, fair, and decentralized method of rewarding genuine contributions to the project.

NateGu ⚡ vibe coder2年前

Reward Pool offers a variety of organization and verification methods. The currently supported verification rules include the following:

Bug Bounty Related

  • Participation in the Bug Bounty
  • The weight of posts in the Bug Bounty

Twitter Related

  • Whether a specific Twitter account is followed
  • Whether a specified tweet has been retweeted
  • Whether a specified tweet has been liked
  • Whether a tweet has been posted according to specific requirements
  • Whether the number of Twitter followers has reached a specified requirement

Blocklet & NFT Related

  • Whether a Blocklet has been published
  • Whether an NFT has been published
  • Whether the published NFT's minting has reached a specified number
  • Whether the publication time of the NFT meets the specified requirements
  • Whether the participant holds an NFT minted from a specified NFT Factory
  • Whether the participant holds a VC issued by a specified Issuer

Product Hunt Related

  • Whether the participant has upvoted a product on Product Hunt

Vote Related

  • Whether the participant has joined a voting event
  • Whether the participant has voted in a voting event
  • Whether the participant has achieved a ranking in a voting event
  • Whether the participant has achieved a specified ranking in a voting event

In the future, these rules will continue to be enriched, and diverse and interesting events will be organized using these rules.

回复