Adding NFT name for display in Factories
Whether they have a public mint link or project url, it would be nice to have NFT names displayed with the collections of factories.
Example of my own:
With the Calamari Cartel, it is the collection name - yet further issuances of other factories would have different NFT names.
If I continue with my naming convention, the factories tab would end up having multiple of the same name, and the only clarification would be the description when viewed. 🤔
8 replies
I'm not very clear about which product and which page you are referring to. Can you provide a screenshot? z1croUysBVjGHD7KtHqZyhxKrCrSB2Z1Daa thank you!
On the blockchain explorer, factories tab.
Really appreciate ！
NFT Name is
xxx #number, does it feel unnecessary to show it?Because it's not in every factory. It's going to be a little weird in the list?
For the future factories in my given example, the collection name would still be the same, however the nft names would not be the same between all of them.
the factories page would end up having 9 factories named "Calamari Cartel" and the only way to tell them apart would be to click them as the NFT names would be different for each one.
the "#'s" of them isnt really a concern in my opinion as you pointed out they would be shown if minted.
Our practice at Aistro is
If you have the same Factory Name, it's really hard to tell the difference, there are more adjustments to be made, such as how to represent wallets, apps and chains. 😓
Because in terms of data, they are really different Factory, they even have different minting limit, minting amount, ...
It is probably easiest and most intuitive for the user to change the name of the Factory for a series Factory.
True, it would still be a different factory but the collection name being the same is the goal - because all of the nfts would still be considered that collection in terms of a visual name, even if their "nft name" would intentionally be different.
honestly I found it more intuitive to use it the way its shown for a naming convention, doing it the other way as you said is done for aistro, ends up using the same input for collection and nft name (not ideal for everyone)
different example:
pokemon cards. they didnt release 151+ different "collections" for the original trading card game, it was one collection with separate "nft names" for energies, the pokemon, etcetera 🤔