Bug bounty issues
Some people are posting and getting qualified for locating a bug as in one letter being wrong in an entire page. Some other people post about crucial and important bugs they find along the process of building or really anything of importance to ABT and the community.
Is it fair that those minor spelling errors (a space missing somewhere) get the same rewards (+1 post in bug bounty) for actually contributing to the ecosystem's security or public image?
A suggestion for a colour change in a label shouldn't be attributed the same value as something that truly matters imho.
So, maybe, and this is a suggestion, the team should be ranking the bug posts of real importance higher than the minor ones? Giving f.e. double - 4x the bug bounty qualified posts .
20 replies
Yeh this is a good point. Perhaps bug bounty can become more strict with what counts as a bug 👌
Ultimately its the teams job to spot these small mistakes but they have a great deal of other stuff to do. If you look at the bigger picture when people highlight a grammatical error it gives the team more time to focus on other ”more important“ tasks. so by discouraging people from raising these spelling mistakes etc it is creating more work for the team who then have to find the errors or it is leaving the mistakes in place and not giving the best impression.
Many hands make light work, so if people have an incentive (bug bounty) for spotting these errors it lightens the load for the team.
Hopefully when the other reward pots are implemented it will balance out what people think is fair in terms of contribution and reward but I think we still need to appreciate everyone’s contributions and be less focused on the monetary reward and who should be getting what. At the end of the day every valid contribution is improving the ecosystem and that is what we should be focusing on rather than how much rewards people can make 🤔
I have been at work for hours already, or else you would have a lot more to counter-argue to. lol
no arguement on my part, just a discussion 😆
Great discussion and suggestions! Thanks for bring this up! We will adopt those recommendations into the program asap, and will get community feedback for the new rules
the limitations wpuld apply to the entire pool, in fairness.
check your attitude
the limitations would apply to me as well, how would it be considered singling anyone out? They'd apply to the entire pool. Its not the same concept as the weight system itself.
How does limiting a users ability to obtain a percentage of a pool when they are contributing to our number one commodities in the ecosystem that actually will result in market cap increases and adoption versus the users here farming coins hunting for minor punctuation errors? Barbie actually made a very good point and I’m glad it was brought up.
High priority bug reporting should be the overwhelming majority of the pool. We have users on here getting reward tokens for saying “good job team”. So yes if we have one or two people doing all the leg work they are entitled to however much percentage as the weight system designates.
And she reveals herself. I knew it was only a matter of time. Lool
I don’t want limit that. the contribution from one can be limitless, don’t want have any ceiling for the possibilit.
I'm glad my sense of justice has stirred up all kinds of passions and we managed to turn community pages into Twitter lmao. The volume of emails I received for notifications oMG 😂
I’m glad we could all get to know each other better tonight. my final points to William have still not been addressed. 🤣
not quite. i was active on here before twitter
0 excitement brought ✅️
issue resolved ✅️
No trust me I’m getting a lot of DM’s on Twitter about how exciting this is looool. And you still havent addressed my point. And I love the virtue signaling coming from your opposite. “My token count is fine” meanwhile the same quality of post continues.
could even implement compounding rewards pools
That’s unfortunate. I’m personally in favor of incentivizing the best builders and the highest priority level bug hunters even if they own the reward pools. I don’t cater to this every one should have something so people don’t get offended. Thank you for the chat. 💯
Uncouth is huge word. Is that one included in your next NFT lore? I hear the community is highly bullish on such things. Especially that last collection that sold like 10 including the ones your group chat bought. 🫠
yes mam
All ideas welcome, there is no right or wrong, just different choice.
At present time, we act as moderators to governance the reward pools, in the future we’ll implement on-chain and automated governance to let community not only contribute idea but also make decision.